El tribunal electoral y los gastos de los partidos políticos en México
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18504/pl2447-006-2016Palabras clave:
Política judicial, gastos políticos, tepjf, trife, ife, partidos políticos. Keywords, judicial politics, political spending, political partiesResumen
Este artículo analiza las razones por las que el tribunal electoral confirma o revoca las multas que impone el ife a los partidos políticos mexicanos, como resultado de la revisión a sus ingresos y gastos. Se confirman parcialmente las expectativas de la literatura sobre política judicial, la cual predice que los tribunales especializados, como el electoral en México, tienen más probabilidades de revocar las decisiones de los organismos especializados que revisan por razones estratégicas. Al analizar 1671 multas impugnadas entre 1997 y 2010, se concluye que aunque los magistrados confirman tres de cada cuatro multas, cuando revocan decisiones del ife se trata de temas visibles como gastos de campaña o cuando las élites políticamente relevantes son las que impugnan.
Descargas
Citas
Arocha, N. & Lujambio, A. (2004). The Rule of Law and Electoral Politics in Mexico. En Democratic Accountability and the Rule of Law in Mexico. Stanford, C.A.: The Democracy, Development and Rule of Law Center.
Bailey, M. A. (2007). Comparable Preference Estimates across Time and Institutions for the Court, Congress, and Presidency. American Journal of Political Science, 3(51), 433-448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00260.x
Bailey, M. A. & Maltzman, F. (2008). Does Legal Doctrine Matter? Unpacking Law and Policy Preferences on the US Supreme Court. American Political Science Review, 3(102), 369-384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055408080283
Barragán, J. (2003). El regreso de la justicia de amparo al conocimiento de la materia electoral. En La agenda política electoral 2003: reflexiones colectivas. México: Editora Laguna.
Baum, L. (1977). Judicial Specialization, Litigant Influence, and Substantive Policy: The Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. Law and Society Review, 11, 823-850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053331
Beer, C. C. (2006). Judicial Performance and the Rule of Law in the Mexican States. Latin American Politics and Society, 3(48), 33-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lap.2006.0029
A. Díaz Domínguez | El tribunal electoral y los gastos de los partidos políticos en México
Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 24(47) | Flacso México | pp. 69-94 | doi: 10.18504/pl2447-006-2016 88 •
Berruecos, S. (2003). Electoral Justice in Mexico: The Role of the Electoral Tribunal under New Federalism. Journal of Latin American Studies, 35, 801-825. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X03006990
Bill Chavez, R. (2004). Rule of Law in Nascent Democracies: Judicial Politics in Argentina. Stanford, C.A.: Stanford University Press.
Black, R. C. & Owens, R. J. (2009). Agenda Setting in the Supreme Court: The Collision of Policy and Jurisprudence. Journal of Politics, 3(71), 1062-1075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609090884
Canes-Wrone, B. (2003). Bureaucratic Decisions and the Composition of the Lower Courts. American Journal of Political Science, 2(47), 205-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00014
Cárdenas, J. (2004). Lecciones de los asuntos Pemexgate y Amigos de Fox. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Córdova, L. & Murayama, C. (2006). Elecciones, dinero y corrupción. Pemexgate y Amigos de Fox. México: Cal y Arena.
Corley, P. C., Howard, R. M. & Nixon, D. C. (2005). The Supreme Court and Opinion Content: The Use of the Federalist Papers. Political Research Quarterly, 3(58), 329-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290505800212
Cross, F B. & Tiller, E. H. (1998). Judicial Partisanship and Obedience to Legal Doctrine: Whistleblowing on the Federal Courts of Appeals. Yale Law Journal, 7(107), 2155-2176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/797418
Dahl, R. (1957). Decision Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policymaker. Journal of Public Law, 6, 267-290.
Domingo, P. (2000). Judicial Independence: The Politics of the Supreme Court in Mexico. Journal of Latin American Studies, 3(32), 705-735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X00005885
Eisenstadt, T. A. (2004). Courting Democracy in Mexico. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490910
Epstein, L. & Knight, J. (2013). Reconsidering Judicial Preferences. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 11-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-032211-214229
Epstein, L. & Knight, J. (1998). The Choices Justices Make. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
Estévez, F., Magar, E. & Rosas, G. (2008). Partisanship in non-Partisan Electoral Agencies and Democratic Compliance: Evidence from Mexico’s Federal Electoral Institute. Electoral Studies, 2(27), 257-271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2007.11.013
A. Díaz Domínguez | El tribunal electoral y los gastos de los partidos políticos en México
Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 24(47) | Flacso México | pp. 69-94 | doi: 10.18504/pl2447-006-2016 • 89
Estévez, F. & Magar, E. (2008). Judges’ Law: Ideology and Coalition in Mexico’s Electoral Tribunal. En The Bayesian Methods in Social Sciences Seminar. México: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1991076
Finkel, J. (2008). Judicial Review as Political Insurance: Argentina, Peru, and Mexico in the 1990s. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Finkel, J. (2003). Supreme Court Decisions on Electoral Rules after Mexico’s 1994 Judicial Reform: An Empowered Court. Journal of Latin American Studies, 3(35), 777-799. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X03006989
Franco, F. (2012). Origen y Desarrollo de la Justicia Constitucional Electoral en México. En Foro Análisis de Sentencias Relevantes a 25 años de la Justicia Electoral. México: Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación.
Ginsburg, T. (2003). Judicial Review in New Democracies. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511189
Graber, M. (2005). Constructing Judicial Review. Annual Review of Political Science, 8, 425-451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104905
Graves, S. E., Howard, R. M. & Corley, P. C. (2014). Judicial Independence: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. Law & Policy, 1(36), 68-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12014
Helmke, G. (2005). Courts under Constraints: Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510144
Inclán, S. (2009). Judicial Reform in Mexico: Political Insurance or the Search for Political Legitimacy? Political Research Quarterly, 4(62), 753-766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912909346740
Klein, D. E. (2002). Making Law in the United States Courts of Appeals. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613708
Kosuke, I., King, G. & Lau, O. (2008). Toward a Common Framework for Statistical Analysis and Development. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 4(17), 892-913. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/106186008X384898
Kosuke, I., King, G. & Lau, O. (2007). Relogit: Rare Events Logistic Regression for Dichotomous Dependent Variables. En Zelig: Everyone’s Statistical Software. Recuperado de http://gking.harvard.edu/zelig
Lawson, Ch. (2006). How Did We Get Here? Mexican Democracy after the 2006 Elections. PS: Political Science & Politics, 1(40), 45-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096507070084
Lindquist, S. A. & Klein, D. E. (2006). The Influence of Jurisprudential Considerations on Supreme Court Decision making: A Study of Conflict Cases. Law and Society Review, 1(40), 135-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00262.x
A. Díaz Domínguez | El tribunal electoral y los gastos de los partidos políticos en México
Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 24(47) | Flacso México | pp. 69-94 | doi: 10.18504/pl2447-006-2016 90 •
Magaloni, B. (2008). Autocratic Political Order and the Role of Courts: The Case of Mexico. En Rule By Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Magaloni, B. (2006). Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510274
Malo, V. & Pastor, J. (1996). Autonomía e imparcialidad en el Consejo General del ife, 1994-1995, Tesis de licenciatura. México: Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México.
Medina, L. (1995). Hacia el nuevo Estado: México, 1920-1994. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Molinar, J. (1991a). El tiempo de la legitimidad. Elecciones, autoritarismo y democracia en México. México: Cal y Arena.
Molinar, J. (1991b). Counting the Number of Parties: An Alternative Index. American Political Science Review, 4(85), 1383-1391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1963951
Paredes, B. (2006a). Evolución de la reglamentación interna en materia de fiscalización. México: Instituto Federal Electoral.
Paredes, B. (2006b). Criterios del Tribunal Electoral en materia de fiscalización. México: Instituto Federal Electoral.
Perry, H. W. (1991). Deciding to Decide: Agenda Setting in the United States Supreme Court. Cambridge, M. A.: Harvard University Press.
Ríos-Figueroa, J. (2012). Sociolegal Studies on Mexico. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8, 307-321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173928
Ríos-Figueroa, J. ( 2007). Fragmentation of Power and the Emergence of an Effective Judiciary in Mexico, 1994-2002. Latin American Politics and Society, 1(49), 31-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2007.tb00373.x
Rosas, G. (2010). Trust in elections and the institutional design of electoral authorities: Evidence from Latin America. Electoral Studies, 1(29), 74-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2009.09.006
Sánchez, A., Magaloni, B. & Magar, E. (2011). Activists vs. Legalists: The Mexican Supreme Court and its Ideological Battles. En Courts in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Segal, J. A. (1984). Predicting Supreme Court Cases Probabilistically: The Search and Seizure Cases, 1962-1981. American Political Science Review, 4(78), 891-900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1955796
A. Díaz Domínguez | El tribunal electoral y los gastos de los partidos políticos en México
Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 24(47) | Flacso México | pp. 69-94 | doi: 10.18504/pl2447-006-2016 • 91 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18504/pl2447-006-2016
Segal, J. A. & Spaeth, H. J. (2002). The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615696
Segal, J. A. & Cover, A. D. (1989). Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1962405
Supreme Court Justices. American Political Science Review, 2(83), 557-565.
Shapiro, M. (1968). The Supreme Court and Administrative Agencies. Nueva York: Free Press.
Staton, J. K. (2010). Judicial Power and Strategic Communication in Mexico. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750632
Staton, J. K. (2006). Constitutional Review and the Selective Promotion of Case Results. American Journal of Political Science, 1(50), 98-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00172.x
Staton, J. K. (2004). The Impact of Judicial Public Relations on Newspaper Coverage (1995-2002). En The American Political Science Association. Chicago, IL.
Unah, I. (1998). The Courts of International Trade: Judicial Specialization, Expertise, and Bureaucratic Policy-Making. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.23153
Woldenberg, J. (1987). La Reforma Electoral de 1986. En 17 Ángulos de un Sexenio. México: Plaza y Valdés.
Publicado
Citas a este artículo:
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0)
