Nuevos modos de conexión con redes globales de innovación: el caso de Chile
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18504/pl2754-009-2019Resumen
Este artículo explora nuevos mecanismos mediante los cuales los países pueden mejorar su conexión con redes globales de innovación, más allá de los mecanismos tradicionales para absorber tecnología extranjera como el comercio internacional y la inversión extranjera directa. A través del estudio del caso de Chile, se discuten las oportunidades y retos asociados al diseño de políticas públicas orientadas a atraer emprendedores extranjeros y universidades internacionales. Este estudio contribuye a la literatura existente sobre la globalización de la innovación, así como a sugerir una serie de recomendaciones para las políticas públicas.
Descargas
Citas
Abramovitz, M. (1986). Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind. Journal of Economic History, 46(2), 385-406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700046209
Acs, Z., Dana, L. P. Jones, M. V. (2003). Toward New Horizons: The internationalisation of Entrepreneurship. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 5-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023257414794
Alatorre, J. E. & Razo, C. (2010). Inward FDI in Chile and its policy context. Columbia FDI Profiles. Nueva York: Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment.
Archibugi, D. & Filippetti, A. (2015). Science, technology and innovation go global. En D. Archibugi & A. Filippetti (Redactores), Handbook of Global Science, Technology and Innovation (pp. 1-12). Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118739044.ch0
Archibugi, D. & Pietrobelli, C. (2003). The globalisation of technology and its implications for developing countries: Windows of opportunity or further burden? Technological Forecasting & Social Change, (70), 861-884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(02)00409-2
Archibugi, D. & Iammarino, S. (2002). The Globalization of Technological Innovation: Definition and Evidence. Review of International Political Economy, 9(1), 98-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290110101126
Archibugi, D. & Michie, J. (1995). The Globalization of Technology: A New Taxonomy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 121-140.
Arias, M., Atienza, M. & Cademartori, J. (2014). Large mining enterprises and regional development in Chile: between the enclave and cluster. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(1), 73-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbt007
Asheim, B. T. & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local ‘Sticky’ and Global ‘Ubiquitous’ Knowledge. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 77-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013100704794
Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J. & Almeida, J. G. (2000). Effects of Age at Entry, Knowledge Intensity, and Imitability on International Growth. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 909-924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/1556419
Barandiaran, J. (2015). Reaching for the Stars? Astronomy and Growth in Chile. Minerva, 53(2), 141-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-015-9272-7
Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A. & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, local pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
Bell, B.W. & Juma, C. (2007). Technology prospecting: lessons from the early history of the Chile Foundation. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 3(2-3), 296-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTG.2007.014338
Berger, M. & Hofer, R. (2011). The Internationalisation of Research and Technology Organisations (RTOs)-Conceptual Notions and Illustrative Examples from European RTOs in China. Science, Technology & Society, 16(1), 99-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/097172181001600106
Boas, T., Dunning, T. & Bussell, J. (2005). Will the Digital Revolution Revolutionize Development? Drawing Together the Debate. Studies in Comparative International Development, 40(2), 95-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686296
Cancino, C. (2014). Rapid internationalization of SMEs: Evidence from born global firms in Chile. Innovar, 24(Número Especial), 141-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v24n1spe.47614
Cano-Kollmann, M., Cantwell, J. A., Hannigan, T. J., Mudambi, R. & Song, J. (2016). Knowledge connectivity: An agenda for innovation research in international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(3), 255-262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2016.8
Carlsson, B. (2006). Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature. Research Policy, 35(1), 56-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.003
Casillas, J. & Acedo, F. (2013). Speed in the Internationalization Process of the Firm. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 15-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00331.x
Castelli, C. & Castellani, D. (2013). The internationalisation of R&D: sectoral and geographic patterns of cross-border investments. Economia e Politica Industriale, 40(1), 127-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/POLI2013-001006
Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Cohen, W. & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
Comisión Europea (2013). Global innovation networks, High Level Economic Expert Group on Innovation for Growth. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Compass. (2015). The Global Startup Ecosystem Report 2015. San Francisco: Compass Inc.
Crespi, G. & Dutrénit, G. (2014). Science, technology and innovation policies for development - The Latin American experience. Londres: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04108-7
Crick, D. & Spence, M. (2005). The internationalisation of ‘high performing’ UK high-tech SMEs: A study of planned and unplanned strategies. International Business Review, 14(2), 167-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.04.007
Criscoulo, P. & Narula, R. (2008). A novel approach to national technological accumulation and absorptive capacity: aggregating Cohen and Levinthal. European Journal of Development Research, 20(1), 56-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09578810701853181
Dachs, B. (2014). Internationalisation of R&D: A brief survey of the literature. En B. Dachs, R. Stehrer & G. Zahradnik (Eds.), The Internationalisation of Business R&D (pp. 5-26). Chentelham: Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783470907
Dube, R. (2015, 23 de agosto). Chile keeps nurturing seeds for ‘Chilecon Valley’. The Wall Street Journal.
Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
Ernst, D. (2002). Global production networks and the changing geography of innovation systems: implications for developing countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11(6), 497-523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590214341
Fraunhofer Chile Research. (2015). Report 2011/2014. Santiago de Chile: Fraunhofer.
Fu, X., Pietrobelli, C. & Soete, L. (2011). The Role of Foreign Technology and Indigenous Innovation in the Emerging Economies: Technological Change and Catching-up. World Development, 39(7), 1204-1212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.05.009
Gammeltoft, P. (2006). Internationalisation of R&D: Trends, Drivers and Managerial Challenges. International Journal of Technology and Globalization, 2(1/2), 177-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTG.2006.009133
García Vega, M. G. (2013, 9 de junio). Bienvenidos a Chilecon Valley. El País.
García, C. R. S., Parodi, A. J. & Oliva, G. (2012). Growing Latin American Science. Science, 338(6111), 1127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232223
Gonzalez-Uribe, J. & Leatherbee, M. (2016). Start-Up Chile ¿Una escuela de emprendimiento efectiva? EPIC Lab White Paper Series núm. 2016/1.
Guimón, J. (2016). Universities as multinational enterprises? The multinational university analyzed through the eclectic paradigm. Multinational Business Review, 24(3), 216-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-07-2016-0025
Guimón, J. (2011). Policies to benefit from the globalization of corporate R&D: An exploratory study for EU countries. Technovation, 31(2), 77-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.08.001
Guimón, J. (2009). Government strategies to attract R&D-intensive FDI. Journal of Technology Transfer, (34), 364-379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-008-9091-1
Guimón, J., Klerkx, L. & Saint Pierre, T. (2016). How to bring global R&D into Latin America: lessons from Chile. Issues in Science and Technology, XXII(2), 17-19.
Humphrey, J. & Schmitz, H. (2002). How Does Insertion in global Value Chains Affect Upgrading in Industrial Clusters? Regional Studies, 36(9), 1017-1027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340022000022198
Johanson, J. & Vahlne, J. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411-1431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.24
Jonkers, K. & Cruz-Castro, L. (2010). The internationalisation of public sector research through international joint laboratories. Science and Public Policy, 37(8), 559-570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X12767691861056
Kaczmarski, M. (2016, 13 de octubre). Attracting innovators: how to lure international entrepreneurs. fDi Magazine.
Kafouros, M. I., Buckley, P. J. & Clegg, J. (2012). The effects of global knowledge reservoirs on the productivity of multinational enterprises: The role of international depth and breadth. Research Policy, 41(5), 848-861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.007
Knight, J. (2014). International Education Hubs: Student, Talent, Knowledge-Innovation Models. Londres: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7025-6
Knight, G. A. & Cavusgil, S. T. (2004). Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2), 124-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400071
Kosmutzky, A. & Putty, R. (2016). Transcending borders and traversing boundaries: A systematic review of the literature on transnational, offshore, cross-border and borderless higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 20(1), 8-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315315604719
Kuemmerle, W. (1999). Foreign direct investment in industrial research in the pharmaceutical and electronics industries-results from a survey of multinational firms. Research Policy, 28(2-3), 179-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00110-3
Larsson, N. (2016, 22 de diciembre). Welcome to Chilecon Valley: a startup hub with its own special charm. The Guardian.
Lederman, D., Messina, J., Pienknagura, S. & Rigolini, J. (2014). Latin American Entrepreneurs: Many Firms but Little Innovation. Washington, D. C.: World Bank. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0012-2
Liu, J., Chaminade, C. & Asheim, B. (2013). The Geography and Structure of Global Innovation Networks: A Knowledge Base Perspective. European Planning Studies, 21(9), 1456-1473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.755842
Mahroum, S. & Scott, E. (2014). What Should Determine Where Start-Ups Choose to Locate? The Five Cs of Place Surplus. (INSEAD Working Paper 2014/25/IIPI). Abu Dhabi: INSEAD. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2413873
Malecki, E. J. (2011). Connecting local entrepreneurial ecosystems to global innovation networks: Open innovation, double networks and knowledge integration. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 14(1), 36-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2011.040821
Marin, A. & Bell, M. (2010). The local/global integration of MNC subsidiaries and their technological behaviour: Argentina in the late 1990s. Research Policy, 39(7), 919-931. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.04.002
Meyer, K.E., Mudambi, R. & Narula, R. (2011). Multinational enterprises and local contexts: the opportunities and challenges of multiple-embeddedness. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2), 235-352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00968.x
Ministerio de Economía, Desarrollo y Turismo. (2014). Agenda de Productividad, Innovación y Crecimiento 2014-2018. Santiago de Chile: Ministerio de Economía, Desarrollo y Turismo.
Ministerio de Economía, Desarrollo y Turismo. (2010). Estrategia Nacional de Innovación 2010-2014. Santiago de Chile: Ministerio de Economía, Desarrollo y Turismo.
Moses, J. & Knutsen, T. (2007). Ways of knowing: Competing methodologies in social and political research. Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-15997-7
Narula, R. & Guimón, J. (2012). The role of multinational corporations in the national innovation systems of the EU new member states. En M. Heidenreich (Ed.), Innovation and Institutional Embeddedness of Multinational Companies (pp. 311-328). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857934338.00025
Negoita, M. & Block, F. (2012). Networks and Public Policies in the Global South: The Chilean Case and the Future of the Developmental Network State. Studies in Comparative International Development, 47(1), 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-012-9097-4
Nelson, R. C. (2007). Transnational strategic networks and policymaking in Chile: CORFO's high technology investment promotion program. Latin American Politics & Society, 49(2), 149-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lap.2007.0024
OCDE. (2011). Location factors for international investment in innovation: attractiveness for innovation. París: OECD Publishing.
OCDE/CAF/CEPAL. (2014). Latin American Economic Outlook 2015. París: OCDE/CAF/CEPAL.
Padilla-Pérez, R. & Gaudin, Y. (2014). Science, technology and innovation policies in small and developing economies: The case of Central America. Research Policy, 43(4), 749-759. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.011
Pérez-Alemán, P. (2005). Cluster formation, institutions and learning: the emergence of clusters and development in Chile. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(4), 651-677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth063
Pfotenhauer, S. H., Wood, D., Roos, D. & Newman, D. (2015). Architecting complex international science, technology and innovation partnerships (CISTIPs): A study of four global MIT collaborations. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, (104), 38-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.006
Poniachik, K. (2002). Chile’s FDI policy: Past experience and future challenges. París: OECD.
Sagasti, F. (2013). Ciencia, tecnología e innovación: Políticas para América Latina (Seg. edición). Lima: FCE.
Saliola, F. & Zanfei, A. (2009). Multinational firms, global value chains and the organization of knowledge transfer. Research Policy, 38(2), 369-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.003
Schrage, M. (2016, 10 de marzo). The best entrepreneurs think globally, not just digitally. Harvard Business Review.
Stake, E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. En N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (Third edition). Londres: Sage Publications.
Start-Up Chile (2016). Informe Start-Up Chile 2010 - Marzo 2016. Santiago de Chile: Start-Up Chile, CORFO.
The Economist. (2012, 13 de octubre). The lure of Chilecon Valley. The Economist.
Thursby, J. & Thursby, M. (2006). Where is the new science in corporate R&D? Science, 314(5805), 1547-1548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134257
Tirado, P. (2016, 12 de diciembre). Los planes de Start-Up Chile: una nueva figura legal “más independiente” y tener un impacto real en el crecimiento del país. El Mercurio.
Wilkins, S. (2016). Transnational Higher Education in the 21st Century. Journal of Studies in International Education, 20(1), 3-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315315625148
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Young, S., Dimitratos, P. & Dana, L. P. (2003). International Entrepreneurship Research: What Scope for International Business Theories? Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 31-42.
Publicado
Citas a este artículo:
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0)
