Political parties and social movements in Latin America (2011- 2016). A configurational analysis

Authors

  • Adrián Albala Universidade de Brasília

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18504/pl2855-002-2020

Keywords:

political representation, social movements, autonomization, Latin America, QCA

Abstract

This work aims to answer the question: Which are the condition for the autonomization of social movements vis-à-vis political parties, in Latin America? Through a study of eigth cases, using a configurational analysis (QCA), I set and test four hypotheses. The findings highlight the relevance of the conditions of State intervention and the identification of political options.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Adrián Albala, Universidade de Brasília

Doctor en ciencias políticas (Université Sorbonne Nouvelle, Francia). Postdoctorado en ciencias políticas (Universidade de São Paulo). Profesor asociado en el Instituto de Ciencas Políticas (IPOL), Universidade de Brasília

References

Albala, A. (2017). Civil Society and Political Representation in Latin America (2010-2015). Towards a Divorce Between Social. Nueva York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67801-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67801-6

Albala, A. & Vieira, S. (2014). ¿Crisis de los partidos en América Latina? El papel de los partidos políticos latinoamericanos en el escenario reciente. Política, 52(1), 145-170.

Alcántara, M. & Tagina, M. L. (2013). Elecciones y política en América Latina 2009-2011. México: Instituto Federal Electoral/M.Á. Porrúa.

Alonso, S., Keane, J. & Merkel, W. (2011). The Future of Representative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511770883

Avritzer, L. (2002). Democracy and the Public Space in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Bardi, L., Bartolini, S. & Trechsel, A. (2014a). Responsive and Responsible? The Role of Parties in Twenty-First Century Politics. West European Politics, 37(2), 235-252. doi:10.1080/01402382.2014.887871 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.887871

Bardi, L., Bartolini, S., & Trechsel, A. (2014b). Party adaptation and change and the crisis of democracy. Party Politics, 20(2), 151–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068813519966

Bartolini, S. & Mair, P. (1990). Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Berezin, M. (2001). Emotions and Political Identity: Mobilizing Affection for the Polity. En J. Goodwin, J. Jasper & F. Polletta (Eds.), Passionate Politics: Emotions and Social Movements (pp. 83-97). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226304007.003.0006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226304007.003.0006

Bidegain, G. (2015). Autonomización de los movimientos sociales e intensificación de la protesta: Estudiantes y Mapuches en Chile (1990-2013). Tesis de Doctorado de Ciencia Política. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Cohen, J. & Arato, A. (1992). Civil Society and Political Theory. New Baskerville: MIT Press.

Colburn, F. (2002). Latin America at the End of Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. doi:10.1515/9780691187532 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691187532

Dahl, R. (2002). La poliarquía. Madrid: Tecnos.

Della Porta, D. & Mattoni, A. (2014). Spreading Protest: Social Movements in Times of Crisis. Colchester: ECPR Press.

Della Porta, D. & Diani, M. (2006). Social Movements: An Introduction. Malden, M. A.: Blackwell.

Diamond, L. & Gunther, R. (2001). Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56021/9780801877841

Eurobarómetro. (2015, diciembre). Eurobarometer Standard 84.

Eurobarómetro. (2011, diciembre). Eurobarometer Standard 74 and 76.

Eurobarómetro. (2007, diciembre). Eurobarometer Standard 68.

Eurobarómetro. (2002, octubre). Eurobarometer Standard 57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51378/eca.v57i648.5554

Eurobarómetro. (1997, diciembre). Eurobarometer Standard 48.

Evans, G. & De Graaf, N. (2013). Political Choice Matters Explaining the Strength of Class and Religious Cleavages in Cross-National Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199663996.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199663996.001.0001

Fondo Monetario Internacional (FMI). (2012). World economic outlook. Recuperado de https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2012/02/

Gerring, J. & Mahoney, J. (2012). A Tale of Two Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Gerring, J., Bond, P., Barndt, W. & Moreno, C. (2005). Democracy and Economic Growth. A Historical Perspective. World Politics, 57(3), 323-364. doi:10.1353/wp.2006.0002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2006.0002

Goodwin, J. & Jasper, J. (2015). The Social Movements Reader Cases and Concepts. Londres: Wiley Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeoss159.pub2

Gurza Lavalle, A. & Szwako, J. (2015). Sociedade civil, Estado e autonomia: argumentos, contra-argumentos e avanços no debate. Opinião Publica, 21(1), 157-187. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-0191211157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-0191211157

Henjak, A. (2010). Political Cleavages and Socio-economic Context: How Welfare Regimes and Historical Divisions Shape Political Cleavages. West European Politics, 33(3), 474-504. doi:10.1080/01402381003654528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402381003654528

Higley, J. & Gunther, R. (1992). Elites and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139173902 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173902

Katz, R. & Mair, P. (1995). Changing models party organization and party democracy: the emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics, 1(1), 5-28. doi:10.1177/1354068895001001001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068895001001001

Kitschelt, H., Hawkins, K., Luna, J. P., Rosas, G. & Zechmeister, E. (2010). Latin American Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511750311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750311

Latinobarómetro. (2015). Informe de prensa. Santiago: Corporación Latinobarómetro.

Latinobarómetro. (2011). Informe de prensa. Santiago: Corporación Latinobarómetro.

Latinobarómetro. (2007). Informe de prensa. Santiago: Corporación Latinobarómetro.

Latinobarómetro. (2002). Informe de prensa. Santiago: Corporación Latinobarómetro.

Latinobarómetro. (1997). Informe de prensa. Santiago: Corporación Latinobarómetro.

Levitsky, S. & Roberts, K. (2011). The Resurgence of the Latin American Left. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/book.1866

Luna, J. P. & Zechmeister, E. (2010). Political Representation un Latin America. En H. Kitschelt, K. Hawkins, J. P. Luna, G. Rosas & E. Zechmeister (Eds.), Latin American Party Systems (pp. 119-144). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Maillet, A. (2015). Variedades de neoliberalismo. Innovación conceptual para el análisis del rol del Estado en los mercados. Revista de Estudios Políticos, (169), 109-136. doi:10.18042/cepc/rep.169.04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rep.169.04

Mainwaring, S. & Torcal, M. (2005). La institucionalización de los sistemas de partidos y la teoría del sistema partidista después de la tercera ola democratizadora. América Latina Hoy, (41), 141-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14201/alh.2442

Mair, P. (1997). Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0198295499.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198295499.001.0001

Manin, B. (1996). Principes du gouvernement représentatif. París: Flammarion.

Mccarthy, J. & Zald, M. (2001). The Enduring Vitality of the Resources Mobilization Theory of Social Movements. En J. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of Sociological Theory (pp. 533-565). Nueva York: Springer. doi:10.1007/0-387-36274-6_25 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36274-6_25

Medina, I., Castillo Ortiz, P., Álamos-Concha, P. & Rihoux, B. (2017). Análisis Cualitativo Comparado (QCA). (Cuadernos Metodológicos, núm. 56). Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.

Moises, J. A. (2010). Democracia e Confiança: Porque os cidadãos desconfiam das Instituições Publicas? São Paulo: Edusp.

Moraes, J. A. (2015). The Electoral Basis of Ideological Polarization in Latin America. (Working Paper, no. 403). Kellogg Institute For International Studies: University of Notre Dame.

Mouffe, C. (2007). En torno a lo político. Buenos Aires: FCE.

Norris, P. (1999). Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0198295685.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198295685.001.0001

Peralta, S. (2013). Do Culture and Institutions Matter? Explaining the Sources of Cross-National Regime Support. Politics & Policy, 41(4), 479-508. doi:10.1111/polp.12024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12024

Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R. & Nonetti, R. Y. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt7s8r7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7s8r7

Przeworski, A., Stokes, S. & Manin, B. (1999). Democracy, Accountability and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139175104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175104

Roberts, K. (2015). Changing Course in Latin America. Party Systems in the Neoliberal Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511842856 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511842856

Roberts, K. (2012). Parties, Party Systems and Political Representation. En P. Kingston & D. Yashar (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Latin American Politics (pp. 48-60). Nueva York: Routledge.

Rosanvallon, P. (2015). Le bon gouvernement. París: Seuil.

Rosanvallon, P. (2006). La contre-démocratie, París: Seuil.

Sani, G. & Sartori, G. (1980). Polarización, fragmentación y competición en las democracias occidentales. Revista de Derecho Político, (7), 7-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/rdp.7.1980.8032

Schneider, C. & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences. A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139004244 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004244

Soifer, H. D. (2012). Measuring State Capacity in Contemporary Latin America. Revista de Ciencia Política, 32(3), 585-598. doi:10.4067/S0718-090X2012000300004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2012000300004

Tarrow, S. (1998). El poder en movimiento. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

Thomassen, J. (2014). Elections and Democracy. Representation and Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198716334.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198716334.001.0001

Urbinati, N. & Warren, M. (2008). The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, (11), 387-412. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.190533 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.190533

Von Beyme, K. (2007). The concept of political class: A new dimension of research on elites? West European Politics, 19(1), 68-87. doi:10.1080/01402389608425121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389608425121

Wnuk-Lipinsky, E. & Bukowska, X. (2011). Civil society. En B. Badie, D. Berg Schlosser & L. Morlino (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Political Science, Vol. 1 (pp. 259-264). Londres: Sage.

Published

2020-01-01

Citas a este artículo:

How to Cite

Albala, A. (2020). Political parties and social movements in Latin America (2011- 2016). A configurational analysis. Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 28(55). https://doi.org/10.18504/pl2855-002-2020

Issue

Section

Articles