¿Democracia deliberativa y judicialización de los derechos sociales?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18504/pl1328-009-2006Keywords:
judicial review, deliberative democracy, social rights.Abstract
This paper explores the implications of deliberative democracy for the judicial enforcement of social rights. In the first part of the paper, the author critically examines the two most common views of democracy that judges use, when they deal with cases concerning social rights, namely, the pluralist and the “rousseauean” views of democracy. In its second part, the author explores the implications of an alternative, deliberative notion of democracy, when dealing with social rights.
Downloads
References
Bhagwati, P., 1985, “Judicial Activism and Public Interest Litigation”, en Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 561.
Bohman, J., 1996, Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy, Cambridge, M. A., MIT Press.
Bork, R.H., 1997, The Tempting of America, New York, Free Press.
Cepeda, M., 2004, “Judicial Activism in a Violent Context”, en Washington University Global Studies Law Review, vol. 3, Special issue, pp. 529–700.
Cohen, J., 1989, “The Economic Basis of a Deliberative Democracy”, en Social Philosophy and Policy, vol. 6(2), pp. 25–50.Easterbrook, F.H., 1992, “Abstraction and Authority”, en University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 59, pp. 349–380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1599940
Elster, J. (ed.), 1998, Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175005
Ely, J., 1980, Democracy and Distrust, Cambridge, M A., Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv102bj77
Fabre, C., 2000, Social Rights under the Constitution. Government and the Decent life, Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198296754.001.0001
Fiss, O.,1976, “Groups and the Equal Protection Clause”, en Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 5, pp. 107–177.
Gloppen, S., 2006, “Analyzing the Role of Courts in Social Transformation”, en R. Gargarella, et al. (eds.), Courts and Social Transformation in New Democracies, forthcoming, Ashgate, London.
Habermas, J., 1996, Between Facts and Norms, Cambridge, The mit Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001
Held, D., 1997, Models of Democracy, Stanford, Stanford University Press.
Hunt, P., 1996, Reclaiming Social Rights, Sidney, Darmouth.
Koh, H., 1999, Deliberative Democracy and Human Rights, Conn, Yale University Press.
Kramer, L., 2001, “Foreword: We the Court”, en The Supreme Court, 2000 Term, vol. 115, núm. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1342592
Manin, B.,1987, “On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation”, en Political Theory,vol. 15(3), pp. 338–368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591787015003005
Michelman, F.,1987, “Possession vs. Distribution in the Constitutional Idea of Property”, en Iowa Law Review, vol. 72, pp. 1319–1350.
Nino, C.,1996, The Constitution of Deliberative Democracy, New Haven, Yale University Press.
–––––, 1991, The Ethics of Human Rights, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Sandel, M.,1996, Democracy’s Discontent. America in Search of a Public Philosophy, Cambridge, M. A., Harvard University Press.
Scott, C. y P. Macklem, 1992, “Constitutional Ropes of Sand or Justiciable Guarantees? Social Rights in a New South African Constitution”, en University of Pennsylvania Law Review 141, 1–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3312396
Sunstein, C.,2004, The Second Bill of Rights, New York, Basic Books.
–––––, 1985, “Interest Groups in American Public Law”, en Stanford Law Review 38, 29–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1228602
Thompson, D., 1999, “Democratic Theory and Global Society”, en Journal of Political Philosophy, 09638016, junio, vol. 7, núm. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00069
Waldron, J., 1999, Law and Disagreement, Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198262138.001.0001
–––––, “A Right–Based Critique of Constitutional Rights”, en Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 13, núm. 1.
Walzer, M.,1981, “Philosophy and Democracy”, en Political Theory, vol. 9, pp. 379–399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009059178100900307
Downloads
Published
Citas a este artículo:
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2006 Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, sede México
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Esta obra está bajo una licencia Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0)
